I should flesh out my response I guess...
My father, an engineer, took one look at the Exclusives and the copper plating and knew they would be a maintenance nightmare, so chose Hilites rather the Hilite Exclusives specifically because he knew the chrome would wear well. He wasn't wrong.
I grew up playing that kit as I was learning, and then a few years ago, it took the journey from my father in the UK to join me in New Zealand. As I've been getting reacquainted with it I've been growing very fond of it. There's something about the thicker shells and larger tom depths which gives it a bit of authority my other kits don't have. As an example, the last four months or so I've only played the Hilite or Vintage Series in the same 14RT/16&18FT and 24BD set up, and I've found the Hilites much easier to gel with. I prefer them to my 80's Recording Customs and while I'm calling on memory, from different spaces etc. I far prefer them to a set of Tama Starclassic maples and a set of DWs from the Keller shell era I've played.
I don't know why that is, so my brain has been formulating educated guesses. The wood is silly soft, like you can sink your finger nail into the shells and dent them easily, and I had guessed that contributes to their warmth. The sizes and shell thickness definitely make a difference I think.
Tellingly, my father who was originally a Premier fanboy, always wondered whether he should have bought Signias instead, although I don't think the buying window really overlapped when he purchased them. A couple of years ago, a set of Signias came to live with me for a while (purchased by a friend who couldn't collect them for a while). They were very obviously a response to Hilites, taking the shell isolation idea a step further. Made very well. Thinner shells with re-rings of, I assume, more conventional maple? I genuinely didn't like them at all, even though Premier fans rave about them. I just didn't think they were on the same page, nowhere near as much body and presence.